Quality of life of families of adolescents undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance therapy: Evaluation of a cohort of parents/guardians of treated and untreated individuals.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) measurements have been employed in medicine and dentistry to assess the effect of diseases and treatment on individuals' lives. AIM: To assess the effect of the initial 12 months of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy on the families of Brazilian adolescents. DESIGN: A cohort of 11- to 12-year-old adolescents and their parents/guardians participated. Treatment group (TG) consisted of 101 parents/guardians of adolescents who began fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. They completed four sets of the Family Impact Scale (FIS) at baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 12 months after the bonding of fixed appliances. Control group (CG) was composed of 175 parents/guardians of adolescents, who did not begin treatment, answering four sets of the FIS at the same intervals. The subscales of FIS were parental/family activity (PA), parental emotions (PE), family conflict (FC) and financial burden (FB). Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The interaction of group (treatment) with time allowed one to observe significant changes in the PA (P < .001), PE (P < .001), FC (P < .001) and overall FIS score (P < .001), demonstrating an improvement in the subscale and overall QoL of families of adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy on the families of adolescents was highly beneficial.

Three-dimensional changes of the upper airway in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the volumetric effects on the upper airways of growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance (HA). METHODS: Volumetric measurements of the upper airways of 42 skeletal Class II malocclusion patients (mean age: 13.8 ± 1.2 years; ranging from 12.0 to 16.9 years) were assessed using cone-beam computed tomography scans acquired before treatment (T0) and approximately 1 year later (T1). The sample comprised a Herbst appliance group (HA group [HAG]; n = 24), and a comparison group (comparison group [CG]; n = 18) of orthodontic patients who had received dental treatments other than mandibular advancement with dentofacial orthopedics. RESULTS: In CG, nasopharynx and oropharynx volumes decreased slightly during the observation period (9% and 3%, respectively), whereas the nasal cavity volume increased significantly (12%; P = 0.046). In HAG, there was an increase in the volume of all regions (nasal cavity, 5.5%; nasopharynx, 11.7%; and oropharynx, 29.7%). However, only the oropharynx showed a statistically significant increase (P = 0.003), presenting significant volumetric changes along the time (T1-T0) in HAG. CONCLUSION: Mandibular advancement with the HA significantly increased the volume of the oropharynx, but no significant volumetric modifications were observed in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx.

Impact of malocclusion on oral health-related quality of life among schoolchildren.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of malocclusion on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among schoolchildren aged 8 to 10 years and their parents in Diamantina, a town in the southeast of Brazil. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 390 randomly selected children who were subjected to a clinical oral examination. The Dental Aesthetic Index was used to diagnose malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment. The Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ (8-10)) was used to evaluate the impact of malocclusion on OHRQoL. The children's parents answered the Brazilian Economic Criterion Questionnaire for the socioeconomic classification. Data analysis involved the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman's correlation coefficients. The variables were grouped into a hierarchy of categories ranging from distal to proximal determinants. Poisson regression analysis with robust variance was performed at each level to correlate the total CPQ (8-10) score with the independent variables. The prevalence of malocclusion was 78.7%. Crossbite remained significantly associated with a negative impact on OHRQoL (PR = 1.28; 95%CI:1.17-1.39; p < 0.001). The prevalence of malocclusion was high in the sample investigated and exerted a negative impact on OHRQoL.

Impact of orthodontic treatment on adolescents' quality of life: a longitudinal evaluation of treated and untreated individuals.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of fixed appliance therapy on the quality of life of a cohort of Brazilian adolescents. METHODS: The treatment group was composed of individuals who started orthodontic treatment. The control group was composed of individuals not selected for immediate treatment. Adolescents answered the Brazilian short form of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14). Higher scores indicate a greater negative impact on quality of life. Adolescents in the treatment group completed four sets of interviews: prior to appliances' bonding (T1), 1 month (T2), 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after appliances' placement. Adolescents in the control group were assigned to a comparable schedule. Statistics included inter-group comparisons, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests, and mixed-effects models. RESULTS: In the treatment group, the functional limitation score was higher at T1 (p = 0.004) and T2 (p = 0.007) compared to T4. The emotional well-being score was higher at T1 compared to T2 (p < 0.001), T3 (p < 0.001) and T4 (p < 0.001). The overall CPQ11-14 score was higher at T1 compared to T2 (p = 0.005), T3 (p < 0.001) and T4 (p < 0.001). The overall CPQ11-14 score was also higher at T2 compared to T3 (p = 0.001). No significant change was found in the control group. In the mixed-effects models, the interaction between group (treatment) and time was significant for functional limitations (p < 0.001), emotional well-being (p < 0.001), social well-being (p = 0.004) and the overall CPQ11-14 score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Quality of life improved among adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. Orthodontists should inform patients what they might expect regarding the physical and the psychosocial repercussions of appliance therapy.

Perception of parents and caregivers regarding the impact of malocclusion on adolescents' quality of life: a cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this article was to assess the perception of parents and caregivers regarding the impact of malocclusion on adolescents’ oral health -related quality of life (OHRQoL). Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of a sample of 280 parents/caregivers of 11 and 12-year-old adolescents who answered the Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ). Parent-assessed quality of life of adolescents was the dependent variable. The main independent variable was adolescents’ malocclusion which was diagnosed by means of the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Based on DAI cut-off points, adolescents were classified into four grades of malocclusion, with different orthodontic treatment recommendations assigned to each grade: no need/slight treatment need, elective treatment, highly desirable treatment and mandatory treatment. Adolescents’ age and sex, as well as family monthly income, were considered as confounding variables. Statistical analysis involved descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and Poisson regression with robust variance. Results: Of the 280 parents/caregivers initially accepted in this study, 18 refused to answer the P-CPQ. Therefore, 262 individuals participated in this assessment, providing a response rate of 93.5%. The severity of adolescents’ malocclusion was significantly associated with a higher negative impact on parents’/caregivers’ perception on the oral symptoms (p< 0.05), functional limitations (p < 0.001), emotional well-being (p < 0.001), and social well-being (p < 0.001) subscale scores as well as on the overall P-CPQ score (p < 0.001), even after having been adjusted for the controlling variables. Conclusions: Parents/caregivers reported a negative impact of malocclusion on adolescents’ OHRQoL. Increased severity of malocclusion is associated with higher adverse impact on OHRQoL.

RESUMO Objetivo: o objetivo deste artigo foi avaliar a percepção de pais/cuidadores com relação ao impacto da má oclusão na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal (QVRSB) de adolescentes. Métodos: este estudo transversal consistiu de uma amostra de 280 pais/cuidadores de adolescentes com 11 a 12 anos que responderam o Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ). A percepção de pais/cuidadores com relação à qualidade de vida dos adolescentes foi considerada a variável dependente. A variável independente principal foi a má oclusão dos adolescentes, que foi diagnosticada por meio do Índice Estético Dental (IED). Com base nos pontos de corte do IED, os adolescentes foram classificados em quatro categorias de má oclusão, com diferentes recomendações de tratamento ortodôntico atribuídas a cada uma dessas categorias: sem necessidade ou com leve necessidade de tratamento; tratamento eletivo; tratamento altamente desejável; e tratamento obrigatório. A idade e o sexo dos adolescentes e a renda familiar mensal foram consideradas variáveis de confusão. A análise estatística envolveu estatística descritiva, análise bivariada e regressão de Poisson com variância robusta. Resultados: dos 280 pais/cuidadores inicialmente aceitos nesse estudo, 18 se recusaram a responder ao P-CPQ. Portanto, 262 indivíduos participaram dessa avaliação, resultando em uma taxa de resposta de 93,5%. A gravidade da má oclusão dos adolescentes foi significativamente associada com um impacto mais negativo na percepção de pais / cuidadores nas subescalas sintomas bucais (p < 0,05), limitações funcionais (p < 0,001), bem-estar emocional (p < 0,001) e bem-estar social (p< 0,001), mesmo após o ajuste para as variáveis de confusão. Conclusões: os pais/cuidadores relataram um impacto negativo da má oclusão na QVRSB dos adolescentes. Quanto mais grave a má oclusão, mais adverso é o impacto dessa condição na QVRSB.

Impact of malocclusion on adolescents' oral health-related quality of life.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of malocclusion on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of 120 Brazilian adolescents with the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11 to 14 year olds (CPQ11-14). Malocclusion was evaluated by 2 calibrated dentists using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Adolescents' sex and age and the families' monthly income were recorded and considered as confounding variables. A total of 117 adolescents completed the CPQ11-14, for a response rate of 97.5%. The multivariate model demonstrated that adolescents diagnosed with malocclusion (n=77) were significantly more likely to report a negative impact on the overall CPQ11-14 score (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-1.51; P < 0.05), as well as on the emotional (PR = 1.74; CI = 1.35-2.24; P < 0.01) and social well-being (PR = 1.62; CI = 1.24-2.12; P < 0.05) subscales, than were those adolescents with no malocclusion (n = 40).

Perception of parents and caregivers regarding the impact of malocclusion on adolescents' quality of life: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE:: The objective of this article was to assess the perception of parents and caregivers regarding the impact of malocclusion on adolescents' oral health -related quality of life (OHRQoL). METHODS:: This cross-sectional study consisted of a sample of 280 parents/caregivers of 11 and 12-year-old adolescents who answered the Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ). Parent-assessed quality of life of adolescents was the dependent variable. The main independent variable was adolescents' malocclusion which was diagnosed by means of the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Based on DAI cut-off points, adolescents were classified into four grades of malocclusion, with different orthodontic treatment recommendations assigned to each grade: no need/slight treatment need, elective treatment, highly desirable treatment and mandatory treatment. Adolescents' age and sex, as well as family monthly income, were considered as confounding variables. Statistical analysis involved descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and Poisson regression with robust variance. RESULTS:: Of the 280 parents/caregivers initially accepted in this study, 18 refused to answer the P-CPQ. Therefore, 262 individuals participated in this assessment, providing a response rate of 93.5%. The severity of adolescents' malocclusion was significantly associated with a higher negative impact on parents'/caregivers' perception on the oral symptoms (p< 0.05), functional limitations (p < 0.001), emotional well-being (p < 0.001), and social well-being (p < 0.001) subscale scores as well as on the overall P-CPQ score (p < 0.001), even after having been adjusted for the controlling variables. CONCLUSIONS:: Parents/caregivers reported a negative impact of malocclusion on adolescents' OHRQoL. Increased severity of malocclusion is associated with higher adverse impact on OHRQoL.

Prospective evaluation of the psychosocial impact of the first 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance among young adults.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychosocial impact of the first 6 months of orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance among young adults and compare the results with those of a control group of patients awaiting treatment for malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study was conducted with a sample of 120 patients on a waiting list for orthodontic treatment at a university. The participants were allocated to an experimental group submitted to treatment and a control group awaiting treatment. The groups were matched for sex and age. All participants were instructed to answer the Brazilian version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) at baseline and after 6 months. Statistical analysis involved the Wilcoxon test for the total PIDAQ score and the score of each subscale. All patients participated until the end of the study. RESULTS: Significant differences between baseline and the 6-month evaluation were found for the total PIDAQ score as well as the dental self-confidence and social impact subscales in both groups. No differences between baseline and the 6-month evaluation were found regarding the psychological impact or esthetic concern subscales in the control group. The patients in the experimental group reported greater esthetic impact 6 months after beginning treatment (P < .001). The first 6 months of orthodontic treatment seem to improve psychosocial impact. CONCLUSION: The first 6 months of orthodontic treatment seem to improve the psychosocial impact of malocclusion. The patients analyzed in the present study reported a greater esthetic impact and less psychological impact after 6 months of using an orthodontic appliance.

Agreement between adolescents and parents or caregivers in rating adolescents' quality of life during orthodontic treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement between Brazilian adolescents and their parents or caregivers regarding the adolescents' oral health-related quality of life during orthodontic treatment. METHODS: The sample consisted of 102 adolescent-parent/caregiver pairs. Adolescents answered the short form of the child perceptions questionnaire, and the parents or caregivers answered the parental-caregiver perceptions questionnaire. These questionnaires have 14 items in common organized across 4 subscales: oral symptoms, functional limitations, emotional well-being, and social well-being. Agreement on the overall score and the subscales was determined using comparison and correlation analysis. The former was performed through comparison of the mean directional and absolute differences. The latter was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean directional difference was significant for the oral symptoms subscale, with parents' reports lower than adolescents' reports (P = 0.012). However, it was not significant for the other 3 subscales and the overall score (P >0.05). The mean absolute difference for the overall score was 5.15, representing 9.2% of the maximum possible score. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.66, indicating substantial agreement. CONCLUSIONS: There was agreement between adolescents and their parents or caregivers in rating adolescents' oral health-related quality of life during orthodontic treatment.

Parent-assessed quality of life among adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment: a 12-month follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess parents' and caregivers' view of the first twelve months of adolescents' orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and to assess the evaluative properties of the Brazilian version of the Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ) in the orthodontic setting. METHODS: Data from a sample of 96 parents and caregivers of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances were collected by means of P-CPQ. Assessments were performed before banding and bracket bonding (T1) and 12 months after placement of fixed appliances (T2). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the overall P-CPQ score and Bonferroni correction for P-CPQ subscales. The evaluative properties of the P-CPQ were assessed through responsiveness calculation and the minimally clinical important difference (MCID). RESULTS: Among the 96 participants, 76 were mothers of patients, 16 were fathers, and four were other family members. Adolescents' mean age was 11.49 ± 0.50 years. Most families earned equal to or less than three times the Brazilian monthly minimum wage. There was significant improvement in the emotional and social well-being subscales (p< 0.001), which contributed to improve patient's overall quality of life (p< 0.001). Reductions in scores were associated with clinically meaningful moderate changes in the overall score as well as in the emotional and social well-being subscales. The MCID was 6.16 for the P-CPQ overall score. CONCLUSION: Parents and caregivers reported significant improvement in the quality of life of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

Parent-assessed quality of life among adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment: a 12-month follow-up

Objective: To assess parents' and caregivers' view of the first twelve months of adolescents' orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and to assess the evaluative properties of the Brazilian version of the Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ) in the orthodontic setting.Methods:Data from a sample of 96 parents and caregivers of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances were collected by means of P-CPQ. Assessments were performed before banding and bracket bonding (T1) and 12 months after placement of fixed appliances (T2). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the overall P-CPQ score and Bonferroni correction for P-CPQ subscales. The evaluative properties of the P-CPQ were assessed through responsiveness calculation and the minimally clinical important difference (MCID).Results: Among the 96 participants, 76 were mothers of patients, 16 were fathers, and four were other family members. Adolescents' mean age was 11.49 ± 0.50 years. Most families earned equal to or less than three times the Brazilian monthly minimum wage. There was significant improvement in the emotional and social well-being subscales (p< 0.001), which contributed to improve patient's overall quality of life (p< 0.001). Reductions in scores were associated with clinically meaningful moderate changes in the overall score as well as in the emotional and social well-being subscales. The MCID was 6.16 for the P-CPQ overall score.Conclusion:Parents and caregivers reported significant improvement in the quality of life of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

Objetivo: avaliar as percepções de pais e cuidadores com relação à qualidade de vida de adolescentes durante os primeiros 12 meses de tratamento ortodôntico com aparelhos fixos, e examinar as propriedades técnicas da versão brasileira do questionário Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire(P-CPQ) no cenário ortodôntico.Métodos:dados de uma amostra de 96 pais e cuidadores de adolescentes em tratamento ortodôntico com aparelhos fixos foram coletados através do questionário P-CPQ. As avaliações foram realizadas antes da bandagem e colagem de braquetes (T1) e 12 meses após a colocação do aparelho fixo (T2). A análise estatística incluiu o teste Wilcoxon signed rankpara o escore total do P-CPQ e a correção de Bonferroni para as subescalas do questionário. As propriedades técnicas do P-CPQ foram examinadas por meio do cálculo da responsividade e da mínima diferença clinicamente importante (MDCI).Resultados:dos 96 participantes, 76 eram mães de pacientes, 16 eram pais e 4 possuíam outra relação familiar. A idade média dos adolescentes foi de 11,49 ± 0,50 anos. A maioria das famílias tinha uma renda mensal igual ou menor a três salários mínimos brasileiros. Houve uma melhora significativa nas subescalas de bem-estar emocional e bem-estar social, que contribuíram para uma melhora do escore total de qualidade de vida (p< 0,001). As reduções dos escores do P-CPQ foram associadas com alterações clinicamente moderadas para o escore total e para as subescalas de bem-estar emocional e bem-estar social. A MDCI para o escore total do P-CPQ foi de 6,16.Conclusões: pais e cuidadores relataram uma melhora significativa na qualidade de vida de adolescentes em tratamento ortodôntico com aparelhos fixos.

Functional and Esthetic Treatment of Lateral Incisor Agenesis with a Mini-Implant in a Young Patient: A Case Report.

This article reports the treatment of lateral incisor agenesis in a young patient. Treatment was performed with a mini-implant and a temporary crown. Radiographic and clinical follow up for one year demonstrated a very satisfactory restoration with regard to function and esthetics as well as the stability of the mini-implant.

One-year clinical evaluation of the retention of resin and glass ionomer sealants on permanent first molars in children

Abstract Aim : To compare the retention of glass ionomer cement (GIC) used as fissure sealant with a resinbased sealant. Methods: Six- to nine-year-old children (n=96) with all permanent first molars in occlusion were examined and assigned to two groups: GIC sealant or resin-based sealant. The sealants were applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The assessment of sealant retention was performed at two-month interval sessions (n=6), when each sample was scored according to the following criteria: complete retention, partial retention or complete loss. The visual and tactile examinations were carried out with a WHO probe, mouth mirror, air syringe and artificial light. The data were submitted to descriptive statistics and survival analysis. Results: A total of 384 occlusal surfaces were analyzed. Independent of the tooth and evaluation time, slightly better results were achieved by the resin-based sealant, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: GIC and resin-based sealants achieved similar results with regards to retention during a one-year follow-up period.

Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to develop a method to assess the changes in palatal and lingual cross-sectional areas in patients submitted to rapid maxillary expansion (RME). METHODS: The sample comprised 31 Class I malocclusion individuals submitted to RME and divided into two groups treated with Haas (17 patients) and Hyrax (14 patients) expanders. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were acquired at T0 (before expansion ) and T1 (six months after screw stabilization). Maxillary and mandibular cross-sectional areas were assessed at first permanent molars and first premolars regions and compared at T0 and T1. Mandibular occlusal area was also analyzed. RESULTS: Maxillary cross-sectional areas increased in 56.18 mm2 and 44.32 mm2 for the posterior and anterior regions. These values were smaller for the mandible, representing augmentation of 40.32 mm2 and 39.91 mm2 for posterior and anterior sections. No differences were found when comparing both expanders. Mandibular occlusal area increased 43.99mm2 and mandibular incisors proclined. Increments of 1.74 mm and 1.7 mm occurred in mandibular intermolar and interpremolar distances. These same distances presented increments of 5.5 mm and 5.57 mm for the maxillary arch. CONCLUSION: Occlusal and cross-sectional areas increased significantly after RME. The method described seems to be reliable and precise to assess intraoral area changes. .

INTRODUÇÃO: o presente estudo teve como objetivo desenvolver um método para avaliar as mudanças nas áreas transversais palatinas e linguais em pacientes submetidos à expansão rápida da maxila (ERM). MÉTODOS: a amostra foi composta por 31 indivíduos com má oclusão Classe I de Angle, submetidos a ERM e divididos em dois grupos, tratados com expansores tipo Haas (17 pacientes) e de Hyrax (14 pacientes). Tomografias computadorizadas de feixe cônico foram adquiridas em T0 e T1 (antes da expansão e seis meses após a estabilização do parafuso). Áreas transversais da maxila e mandíbula foram avaliadas nas regiões de primeiros molares permanentes e pré-molares e comparadas entre T0 e T1. A área oclusal mandibular também foi analisada. RESULTADOS: as áreas transversais maxilares aumentaram 56,18mm2 e 44,32mm2 para regiões posterior e anterior, respectivamente. Esses valores foram menores para mandíbula, representando aumentos de 40,32mm2 e de 39,91mm2 para as seções anterior e posterior. Não foram encontradas diferenças quando se comparam os dois expansores. A área oclusal mandibular aumentou 43,99mm2 e incisivos inferiores vestibularizaram. Incrementos de 1,74mm e 1,7mm ocorreram entre as distâncias intermolares e interpré-molares inferiores. Essas mesmas distâncias apresentaram incrementos de 5,5mm e de 5,57mm para maxila. CONCLUSÃO: as áreas transversais avaliadas e oclusal de mandíbula aumentaram significativamente após a ERM. O processo descrito parece ser um método confiável e preciso para avaliar as mudanças das área intrabucais propostas. .

Dissatisfaction with dentofacial appearance and the normative need for orthodontic treatment: determinant factors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the normative need for orthodontic treatment and the factors that determine the subjective impact of malocclusion on 12-year-old Brazilian school children. METHODS: A total of 451 subjects (215 males and 236 females) were randomly selected from private and public schools of Juiz de Fora, Brazil. The collected data included sociodemographic information and occlusal conditions. The esthetic subjective impact of malocclusion was assessed by means of the Orthodontic Aesthetic Subjective Impact Score - OASIS, whereas the malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment were assessed by means of the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC). RESULTS: Prevalence of normative need for orthodontic treatment was 65.6% (n = 155), and prevalence of orthodontic esthetic subjective impact was 14.9%. The following variables showed significant association with esthetic subjective impact of malocclusion: female (p = 0.042; OR = 0.5; CI = 0.2-0.9), public school student (p = 0.002; OR = 6.8; CI = 1.9-23.8), maxillary overjet ≥ 4 mm (p = 0.037; OR = 1.7; ICI = 1-3) and gingival smile ≥ 4 mm (p = 0.008; OR = 3.4; CI = 1.3-8.8). CONCLUSION: The normative need for orthodontic treatment overestimated the perceived need. Occlusal and sociocultural factors influenced the dissatisfaction of schoolchildren with their dentofacial appearance.

Immediate changes in condylar position after rapid maxillary expansion.

INTRODUCTION: Although the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion are well documented, the condylar response to this procedure is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to test the following null hypothesis: rapid maxillary expansion promotes immediate changes of the position of the condyles in patients with Class I malocclusion. METHODS: Thirty-four subjects with Class I malocclusion underwent rapid maxillary expansion. Cone-beam computed tomography images were collected before activation of the expander and 3 weeks later, after screw stabilization. Using specific software functions, it was possible to determine and reproduce head positioning and landmarks during the different times of the study. RESULTS: The axial, coronal, and sagittal planes were examined, and no asymmetries in condylar positions were found at either time. However, statistically significant anterior and inferior displacements of these structures occurred, with respective average values of 0.52 and 0.49 mm. Lateral inclinations of both condyles were observed and confirmed by the coronal condylar angles. CONCLUSIONS: The null hypothesis was rejected. Statistically significant anterior and inferior displacements of the condyles occurred. Lateral inclination of the condyles was observed.

Dissatisfaction with dentofacial appearance and the normative need for orthodontic treatment: determinant factors

OBJECTIVE: This study aims at assessing the normative need for orthodontic treatment and the factors that determine the subjective impact of malocclusion on 12-year-old Brazilian school children. METHODS: A total of 451 subjects (215 males and 236 females) were randomly selected from private and public schools of Juiz de Fora, Brazil. The collected data included sociodemographic information and occlusal conditions. The esthetic subjective impact of malocclusion was assessed by means of the Orthodontic Aesthetic Subjective Impact Score - OASIS, whereas the malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment were assessed by means of the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC). RESULTS: Prevalence of normative need for orthodontic treatment was 65.6% (n = 155), and prevalence of orthodontic esthetic subjective impact was 14.9%. The following variables showed significant association with esthetic subjective impact of malocclusion: female (p = 0.042; OR = 0.5; CI = 0.2-0.9), public school student (p = 0.002; OR = 6.8; CI = 1.9-23.8), maxillary overjet ≥ 4 mm (p = 0.037; OR = 1.7; CI = 1-3) and gingival smile ≥ 4 mm (p = 0.008; OR = 3.4; CI = 1.3-8.8). CONCLUSION: The normative need for orthodontic treatment overestimated the perceived need. Occlusal and sociocultural factors influenced the dissatisfaction of schoolchildren with their dentofacial appearance. .

OBJETIVO: o objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a necessidade normativa de tratamento ortodôntico e os fatores que determinam o impacto subjetivo da má oclusão, em escolares brasileiros de 12 anos. MÉTODOS: um total de 451 indivíduos (215 homens e 236 mulheres) foi selecionado aleatoriamente de escolas públicas e particulares de Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais. Os dados coletados incluíam informações sociodemográficas e condições oclusais. O impacto estético subjetivo da má oclusão foi avaliado pelo Orthodontic Aesthetic Subjective Impact Score (OASIS). A avaliação da má oclusão e a necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico foram avaliadas pelo Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) e pelo Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC). RESULTADOS: a prevalência da necessidade normativa de tratamento ortodôntico foi de 65,6% (n = 155) e a prevalência do impacto estético ortodôntico subjetivo foi de 14,9%. As seguintes variáveis mostraram associação significativa com impacto estético subjetivo da má oclusão: sexo feminino (p = 0,042, OR = 0,5, IC = 0,2-0,9); aluno de escola pública (p = 0,002, OR = 6,8, IC = 1,9-23,8); ≥ 4mm (p = 0,037, OR = 1,7; ICI = 1-3); e sorriso gengival ≥ 4mm (p = 0,008, OR = 3,4, IC = 1,3-8,8). CONCLUSÃO: a necessidade normativa de tratamento ortodôntico superestimou a necessidade percebida. Fatores oclusais e socioculturais influenciaram a insatisfação de escolares com a aparência dentofacial. .

Mandibular permanent first molars and incisors as predictors of mandibular permanent canine and premolar widths: applicability and consistency of the method.

INTRODUCTION: Estimating the mesiodistal widths of the mandibular permanent canines and premolars is an essential aspect of mixed dentition analysis. A method is proposed to predict the sum of the mandibular permanent canine and premolar widths based on the sum of the mandibular permanent first molars and incisors. In this study, we aimed to test the applicability and reliability of this method in a population in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The methods of Moyers and of Tanaka and Johnston were also tested. METHODS: The sample consisted of 200 orthodontic study models, obtained from white Brazilian patients (123 female, 77 male). The mesiodistal widths of the teeth were measured with an analog caliper. Paired Student t tests with a significance level of 5% were used to compare the actual and predicted values. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the predicted and actual values of the sum of the mandibular permanent canine and premolar widths when using the new method. The differences were 0.6 mm for the male sample, 0.5 mm for the female sample, and 0.6 mm for the total sample; the standard deviations were 1.9, 2.1, and 2.2 mm, respectively. However, overestimated predicted values with differences of 1.4 and 1.9 mm (male and female) in the Moyers method and 1.9 and 3.3 mm (male and female) in the Tanaka and Johnston method were found. CONCLUSIONS: The new method is consistent and applicable to the population of Belo Horizonte. The other 2 methods tended to overestimate the actual values of the permanent canines and premolars.